Transit Negotiations: How we got here and how we can get out

Press release.

How we got here and how we can get out

The City of Guelph is interested, first and foremost, in having Guelph Transit back serving the community as soon as possible. To achieve this, the City needs to reach a reasonable and affordable contract agreement with ATU Local 1189. When transit is running for the community and the City’s employees are back in the workplace, City administration and their transit employees can address workplace concerns and rebuild a positive and productive relationship.

The following details the sequence and rationale behind where we’ve ended up and the continued hope for a fast resolution.

·   Exhaustive negotiation

: Months of negotiations through to the end of June including 22 days of bargaining – seven with a conciliator – led to a list of demands from the ATU, which had not yet included a wage and benefit proposal. The union had indicated a wish to reach wage parity with Grand River Transit so we have included those figures in our calculation. The cost of ATU’s demands combined with wage parity with Grand River Transit would be:

o $4.6 million in new dollars over three years

o An additional 2.34% increase to property taxes over three years

o 20 to 30 new unionized drivers to cover requests for vacation days, lieu days, floater days, birthdays off etc.

o No improvement to transit service delivery

· First offer

: On Wednesday, June 25 the City put an offer on the table with a deadline for union response that was missed. When asked if the union would take it to its members the response was it would take it to the members in two to three weeks with a clear endorsement against the proposal.

· Final offer

: On Friday, June 27 the City put forward a “final offer” to ensure a ministry-monitored vote in a faster timeframe.

· Offer rejected

: On July 11 ATU members rejected the vote – 186 voted no and 12 voted yes

· Notice of lockout announcement

: On July 12, Mayor Karen Farbridge and Chief Administrative Officer Ann Pappert address the media and public to provide two days of notice to the community before suspending Guelph Transit service.

· Tentative agreement

: At midnight on July 13 the City and union executive agree to a tentative agreement:

o The union brought 15 items to the table for consideration andconsensus was reached on the resolution of the items.

o Agreement to resolve that list included agreement on a binding letter of understanding about key workplace concerns raised by the union that fall outside the collective bargaining agreement (e.g. lunchroom and washroom facilities)

o Signed by ATU executive and City administration

o Ratified on July 14 by Guelph City Council

Typically, union executives only accept and take agreements to a membership vote if they are confident they will be ratified.

· Tentative agreement rejected

: Union executive recommend tentative agreement that is “overwhelmingly” rejected by the union members.

· Lockout reinstated

: With the City’s original concerns compounded with an increased disconnect between union executive and members and potential instability within the union, the lockout was reinstated.

· Why lockout

: City makes decision to lockout ATU Local 1189

o A consistent pattern of unexplained and lengthy delays leads City officials to believe the union is trying to delay negotiations to September before taking a strike vote. A September strike would create the maximum amount of disruption to the Guelph community (transit ridership moves from 7,000 per day in July to 14,000 per day in September) and apply political pressure in an effort to force capitulation to union demands.

o Typically lockouts take effect immediately to protect the safety of the community, frontline service providers and property.

o Exhaustive negotiations with a union that hadn’t moved on any items on the table; hadn’t offered wage and benefit requests; and, based on comments in the media, hadn’t been clear about its members’ main concerns

o Working without a contract indefinitely creates uncertainty for employees and service users and continual negotiations is a perpetual drain on public funds.

· Lack of clarity

: The gap between union executive and members on the tentative agreement has not been explained officially by the union to City officials.

The union president and lead negotiator stated in a Guelph Mercury
article
on July 24 that: “I don’t believe it’s a mystery,” Cleary said of the issues, “which were outlined in a package presented during negotiations last October. They know what was in that package.”

Which takes us back to where we were at the beginning. ATU Local 1189 requests add up to a 2.34% property tax increase over three years to maintain existing service levels for on City department. To put that number in perspective, the 2014 tax increase from the City’s entire operating budget including fire, emergency services, public works, transit, parks and recreation etc., etc. was 2.38% total.

· Union instability

: The union’s negotiating team changed on June 18 with a slim vote margin and a second union executive vote is expected at the end of July. Another change in the negotiating team could mean new priorities, a new approach and, most certainly, more delays.

· Counter offer

: The City has demonstrated its willingness to make adjustments within the Council-approved negotiation mandate as well as its interest in addressing workplace concerns through the binding letter of understanding in the tentative agreement. A reasonable and affordable counter offer would be seriously considered by the City.

Advertisements

6 Comments

Filed under On the Buses

6 responses to “Transit Negotiations: How we got here and how we can get out

  1. Good summary. Where is the ATU’s summary of events?

    • Ray

      Maybe they are prevented to publish it, as they are prevented to go to work. A key member of the ATU’s negotiation team is denied access to any city property. How can the ATU negotiate if members of it’s negotiating team is denied access to city hall?

  2. Why the use of quotation marks and “eg.”? Takes what should be clear and concise and makes it weasely.

  3. Shefali

    This is a terrible and disgusting use of city time and money. I understand that some changes need to be made, but screwing over an entire city that absolutely RELIES on this service is ridiculous. I make minimum wage, and work 7 days a week, only so that I can cover basic expenses, and pay off extensive schooling debt. I haven’t had a BIRTHDAY off in years, and am rarely able to afford to take sick days. Now I can’t even get to work without walking for two and a half hours there and back.
    Thanks City of Guelph. Thanks Guelph Transit. I’ll be homeless soon. As will many of my neighbors and their children.

  4. Farrah Trahan

    So our transit drivers are not aloud to make the same at GRT but other city staff can make more??? How much will our taxes go up to build the fancy new police station?? Oh and what about the city hall fiasco? And seriously everyone deserves access to a washroom while working. I’m so tired of hearing complaints about bus drivers stopped at Tim’s while on route. Do you have someone questioning you when nature calls???

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s