$265,000 for Wilson Farm House? Let’s get real.

A resident’s comments.

The favourite number being batted around as of late by proponents of keeping the Wilson Farmhouse (on Simmonds Dr) is that going ahead with the staff recommendation of documenting, salvaging and demolishing the building will come at a cost of $265,000.

This fabricated number in the form of a public scare tactic is based on a) an opportunity cost, and b) a wild assumption.

Reported in the Tribune, as well as by ‘heritage concerned citizens’, people are citing that it will cost $265,000 based on the fact that the city will not collect revenue from its severance and sale on the private market for an estimated “$200,000-$250,000”.

The opportunity cost of not selling is not a real cost.

The revenue was not originally budgeted upon acquisition of the land by the city, and therefore represents only an opportunity, not cash spent.

The WILD assumption is that someone would actually come along and purchase this property given the amount of work it needs, the spectre of heritage limitations and interests, the awkward placement, and the sheer can of worms any seasoned renovations expert knows to expect with a home like this. What a sale to private interest could expect to net, and when it happen is anyone’s guess.

So, if we are really concerned about fiscal responsibility as the editorials suggest, then we would do well to note the option of documenting, salvaging, and demolishing the building is at an “estimated cost of $30,000 – $50,000 represents minimal costs”.

Come on, folks. Documenting and salvaging will preserve the historical value of this home that has come upon unfortunate neglect.
And no, dear taxpayer, it will not cost you a mythical $265,000.

Let’s work with real costs. Like minimal ones.   KH


1 Comment

Filed under Heritage, Wilson Farm Park

One response to “$265,000 for Wilson Farm House? Let’s get real.

  1. Kevin Huinink

    Further, it is based on the assumption that you accept that a parcel of land donated with the intention of community use can be turned on its head and changed into a revenue generator by flipping it back to public residential sale.
    Try that one with Sunny Acres or Exhibition parks, under the auspices that the revenue will be used for community benefit.
    Council, you can honour this building and the intent of its donor by dismantling, passing what little is ‘old or historical’ to local museums, and have the space really designated for community use…. not a private residence with business interest.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s